There's a common misconception
about Stoics that they're nothing more than a bunch of apathetic and
lofty people. Maybe it has something to do with our modern day
definition of the word “stoic”, which means someone who is aloof
and uncaring about what happens around them. This is, of course, wrong,
but I can see where people might have gotten the idea.
The very basics of Stoic philosophy
states there isn't much in our control. It's easier to say what
is in on control: our thoughts, opinions, and desires. Anything
outside those belongs to what we can't control. These things we can't control
the Stoics call indifferents.
But doesn't indifferent mean uncaring? If anything we can't control is an indifferent, does
that mean we shouldn't care about it?
Well, no. What the Stoic means when
they speak of indifferents is that the object or event at hand have
no bearing on living a good life. To the Stoics, Nature gave us
reason, and with reason we can obtain virtue, and with virtue a good
life (and, at least according to the later Roman Stoics,
tranquility).
Does that mean we shouldn't worry
about indifferents? Again, no. The Stoics saw a difference in
indifferents: preferred and undesired. Even though a cave would
shelter us, we'd prefer a house. Catching a cold didn't mean we
couldn't work towards a good life, but that doesn't mean we'd go
looking for illness. It's all in how we judge these things. If you
think money buys happiness, you'll never have enough money. If you
think you create your own happiness, you'll always be rich. Think
dying is the greatest evil, you'll be too worried to live. Think
dying is no thing at all, you'll have all the time to live. And so on
and so on.
One way to think of indifferents is
that they are like tools. We'd use a screwdriver to place screws, but
we'd be silly to think it could hammer in nails or paint. We'd also
be foolish to think the more screwdrivers, the better, simply because
we needed one in the first place. And we wouldn't insist on using a
screwdriver when only a hammer is needed. Sure, some people might get
overly attached to one brand or another (another indifferent), but in
the end, it's what works for you in that moment that's most
important. And none of it would work without proper use of reason
(like that whole “trying to paint with the screwdriver” thing.
Reason prevents that sort of silliness).
Of course, the analogy falls a
little flat when it comes to situations and people, both of which
also counts as indifferents. We don't like to think of people as
tools, which thankfully Stoicism doesn't promote, and we do often
feel like we have at least some control over most situations. So how
can it be these things are indifferents?
Remember, anything outside of our
control is considered an indifferent. People, no matter how much we'd
like to think about it, are always outside of our control. We can't
help what they do, say, think, and so on. Insults, flattery, being
cutoff in traffic – all these things don't bother the Stoic sage or
inflate their ego. Now, we mere mortals aren't going to be prefect,
of course, but the thing to remember is that most people aren't out
to get us and, even if they were, we don't have any control over
them. All we can control is what we think of other people and what
they say and do. We can either become upset with them and ruin our
day or think nothing of it and go on our day with little to no
disturbance to our emotional state.
Okay, so maybe that makes some
sense, but what about events in our life? Don't we have control over,
say, getting to work on time? Sure, maybe we can't account for
traffic and bad driving, but we do control some things. Well, not
really. See, we are in control of our intention – our desire – to
get to work on time, but that's it. Maybe we don't hear the alarm, or
wake up and we find ourselves bound and gagged (my commiserations to
your bad start, by the way). Even if we don't have any problems and
do get to work on time, none of that was in your power. Once again,
only your intention of getting to work was in your power.
The thing that needs to be
remembered is that indifferent in the Stoic sense isn't one of
apathy. The only thing it means is that they aren't either good or
bad. Most of the time, it's how we see and think about the
indifferents is what make them good or bad. So if it seems if a Stoic
is unaffected by insults and maybe a little too uncaring about a
underlings flattery, or if a flat tire doesn't disturb them, odds are
it's because they decided it wasn't going to help them to live a good
life to be concerned about it. But apathy it isn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment